1. Introduction: Understanding modularity in fashion

Modularity is a design approach in which a system is composed of independent yet interconnected units that can be combined, removed, or replaced without redesigning the entire structure (Zhang et al., 2024). Each module performs a defined function while remaining compatible with the overall system.

In fashion, modularity translates into garments constructed from detachable or interchangeable components. Sleeves, collars, panels, linings, or other elements can be added, removed, or reconfigured, allowing a single garment to generate multiple variations. Rather than existing as fixed objects, modular garments function as adaptable systems.

This approach redefines the relationship between designer, garment, and wearer. The garment becomes dynamic rather than static. Dressing becomes a participatory act in which the wearer actively configures the final form.

1.1 Why modularity is important today

From a sustainability perspective, modular design offers a strategy for extending product life and reducing material use. Instead of purchasing multiple garments to satisfy different aesthetic or functional needs, users can adapt one garment across contexts.

Modularity addresses several contemporary challenges:

• Overproduction and overconsumption

• Short product lifecycles

• Limited repairability

• Resource inefficiency

By allowing parts to be replaced or updated independently, modular garments reduce the need for complete replacement. If a sleeve wears out, it can be replaced without discarding the entire jacket. If seasonal needs change, components can be adapted rather than replaced.

Importantly, modularity encourages a more conscious relationship with clothing. When users participate in configuring or updating garments, attachment often increases. This participatory dimension can counteract disposability culture.

1.2 Modularity and Circularity

Modularity is closely aligned with circular economy principles, particularly those focused on extending product life and enabling repair. While recycling operates at the end of a garment’s life, modularity intervenes during its active use phase.

Designing garments that can be repaired, transformed, or upgraded supports a recover–reuse–repair logic rather than a take–make–dispose model. By maintaining the value of materials and labour embedded in a garment, modularity contributes to reducing waste and lowering environmental impact.

At the same time, modularity must be implemented thoughtfully. If modules are produced excessively or replaced purely for aesthetic novelty, the environmental benefit may be undermined. The effectiveness of modular design depends on how it is integrated into broader sustainability strategies.

1.3 Learning Objectives

By the end of this module, learners should be able to:

• Define modularity as a design method in fashion

• Explain the relationship between modular design and circular principles

• Identify historical and contemporary examples of modular garments

• Analyse the environmental and systemic implications of modularity

Image 1: Diagram illustrating a modular garment system with detachable sleeve, collar, and body modules, retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924000892

2. Historical roots and evolution of modularity in fashion

Modularity in fashion is often associated with contemporary sustainability discourse, yet its origins are deeply historical. Long before the term was formalised, garments were constructed with detachable or interchangeable elements for practical, economic, and symbolic reasons.

2.1 Renaissance Modularity

Although modular fashion is typically linked to the twentieth century, earlier examples can be traced to Renaissance Europe. Detachable sleeves, collars, and decorative inserts were common features of elite dress. These elements were attached using laces, ribbons, or ties, allowing them to be removed for washing, repair, or aesthetic variation.

Beyond functionality, modular components served as markers of wealth and social status. Fine fabrics and elaborate detailing could be concentrated in removable sections, which were easier to update or replace. This system allowed garments to be reconfigured while preserving the core structure.

In this context, modularity functioned as both a practical solution and a symbol of prestige.

Image 2: Portrait illustrating sixteenth-century Italian dress and detachable garment elements, retrieved from https://www.arteapalazzo.it/moda/la-moda-nel-xvi-secolo-1500-1550/

Image 3: Raphael’s Dama col liocorno (Lady with a Unicorn), illustrating Renaissance garment construction and layered bodice design, retrieved from https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dama_col_liocorno

2.2 Victorian Adaptability and Functionality

In the Victorian period, modularity continued to shape clothing design, particularly in response to economic and social constraints.

In menswear, detachable shirt fronts or collars (dickeys) allowed men to maintain a formal appearance without laundering entire garments. In womenswear, interchangeable bodices and skirts enabled a single dress to be adapted for daytime or evening use.

These solutions provided versatility and reduced material expenditure. Modularity allowed garments to respond to shifting social expectations without requiring complete replacement.

Image 4: Illustration of Victorian-era menswear demonstrating layered tailoring and detachable garment components, retrieved from https://www.arteapalazzo.it/moda/moda-in-epoca-vittoriana/

2.3 Military and Workwear Influence

The twentieth century introduced new forms of modular logic through military and workwear systems. As mass production expanded, standardisation became essential. Military uniforms incorporated interchangeable components — pockets, layers, fastening systems — to improve efficiency and maintenance.

During and after World War II, innovations in synthetic fibres and large-scale production contributed to modular equipment systems governed by military specifications (MIL-SPEC). Standardised sizing, fastening mechanisms, and replaceable parts simplified repair and ensured compatibility across components.

These principles later influenced civilian sectors such as outdoor clothing and functional fashion. Durability, adaptability, and interchangeability became central features of performance garments.

In this phase, modularity shifted from decorative variation to technical functionality.

2.4 Modernist and Avant-Garde Experiments

In the 1960s and 1970s, designers such as Pierre Cardin, André Courrèges, and Rudi Gernreich experimented with modular construction, detachable panels, and futuristic silhouettes. These explorations reflected broader cultural movements toward minimalism, space-age aesthetics, and structural innovation.

A significant milestone emerged in 1997 with Issey Miyake and Dai Fujiwara’s A-POC (A Piece of Cloth) project (L’Officiel Italia, 2020). This system enabled garments to be cut directly from a continuous textile tube, allowing users to customise shapes with minimal waste. A-POC anticipated later conversations about circularity and material efficiency by integrating modularity into textile design itself.

These experiments demonstrated that modularity could operate as both conceptual exploration and structural innovation.

Image 5: A-POC (A Piece of Cloth) concept by Issey Miyake, showing garments engineered from a single continuous textile tube to minimise cutting waste, retrieved from https://www.lofficielitalia.com/fashion/yoshiyuki-miyamae-intervista-progetto-issey-miyake-a-poc-able

2.5 Contemporary Modularity (2000–Present)

With the rise of fast fashion in the late twentieth century, clothing cycles accelerated and garments became increasingly disposable. In response, modular fashion has re-emerged as a strategy for extending use and reducing material throughput.

Contemporary modular design emphasises:

• Reusability

• Repairability

• Replaceable components

• Transformability

Aligned with circular principles, modular garments reduce environmental impact by enabling partial updates instead of full replacement. However, modularity must be implemented thoughtfully. If modular components are produced excessively or driven by aesthetic novelty alone, they risk reproducing the same consumption patterns they aim to challenge.

Today, modular fashion occupies a dual space: it is both a research-driven design strategy and a growing commercial practice. Its effectiveness depends on balancing adaptability, durability, and user engagement.

Image 6: Modular garment system by Flavia La Rocca retrieved from https://secondstreet.ru/blog/kreativnaia_moda/flavia-la-rocca.html

3. Theoretical frameworks for modularity in fashion

Modularity in fashion can be understood not only as a construction method, but as a systemic design strategy. It operates at the intersection of product design, user participation, and service-oriented business models. To fully grasp its potential, it is useful to examine modularity through broader theoretical lenses.

3.1 Systems Thinking and Modular Design

Systems thinking views products as part of interconnected networks rather than isolated objects (Casciani, 2023). In fashion, a garment interacts with material supply chains, manufacturing processes, distribution systems, user behaviour, and end-of-life infrastructures.

Modular design reflects this systemic perspective. Each component of a garment functions as an independent unit while remaining integrated within a larger structure. When a sleeve, panel, or lining can be replaced without discarding the entire garment, the system becomes more flexible and resilient.

This logic mirrors modular systems in architecture and industrial design, where independent elements allow adaptation without total reconstruction. In fashion, this approach challenges the idea of the garment as a fixed, indivisible entity. Instead, clothing becomes a configurable system capable of responding to change.

Systems thinking, therefore, reframes modularity as a structural strategy that anticipates evolution rather than permanence.

3.2 Product–Service Systems (PSS)

Modularity aligns closely with the concept of Product–Service Systems (PSS), which integrate physical products with services to create value beyond ownership (Rinaldi, 2019).

In a traditional model, value is generated through repeated sales of new garments. In a PSS model, value can be created through:

• Repair services

• Component replacement

• Subscription models

• Rental or exchange systems

• Upgrade programmes

Modular garments facilitate these services because components can be updated independently. A worn-out module can be replaced, a seasonal module can be swapped, and a stylistic update can occur without manufacturing a completely new garment.

This approach shifts emphasis from volume-based production to long-term engagement. Rather than encouraging disposal, the system supports maintenance and transformation.

However, the environmental benefit of PSS depends on responsible implementation. If modules are replaced frequently for novelty rather than necessity, material throughput may not decrease. Modularity must therefore be integrated within broader sustainability goals.

3.3 Co-Creation and User Participation

One of the most distinctive aspects of modular fashion is the active role of the user. When garments can be reconfigured, the wearer becomes a participant in the design process.

This participatory dimension introduces an element of co-creation. Users select configurations, adapt modules to context, and sometimes replace components themselves. Such interaction can strengthen attachment by increasing familiarity and agency.

Unlike conventional garments, which are completed before purchase, modular garments retain an element of openness. The final form may change over time, reflecting the wearer’s needs and preferences.

Co-creation therefore contributes not only to adaptability but also to longer-term engagement.

3.4 Modularity and Emotional Attachment

The emotional durability of a product refers to a brand’s ability to create a lasting emotional bond between the object and its user (Chapman, 2005). This connection arises from the association of the product with positive experiences and feelings, going beyond its functional or technical value.

In the field of sustainable design, various design strategies are adopted to strengthen the emotional bond between the user and the product, with the aim of preventing disposal. In fashion, not only are factors such as comfort, fit and aesthetics important, but also the services provided during and after purchase, such as assistance, warranty, repair and replacement. All these factors influence the perceived value of the garment, determining whether it will be preserved, cared for or discarded by the consumer.

Modularity encourages this type of relationship by allowing garments to be adapted, updated and personalised. The ability to change the look and configuration of a garment according to one’s preferences strengthens the emotional bond between the garment and the wearer, transforming clothing into a means of personal expression.

Image 7: Circular fashion system diagram retrieved from https://www.redressdesignaward.com/academy/resources/guide/design-for-longevity

4. Modularity and sustainability

Modularity is often discussed as a design innovation, but it is also a sustainability strategy. By enabling garments to be updated, repaired, and adapted over time, modular design can extend product lifespan and reduce waste. Its impact is strongest when modularity supports long-term use rather than short-term novelty.

4.1 Product Life Cycle: A Brief Definition

A product’s life cycle describes the phases it typically moves through from design to withdrawal from the market. It is often described through five stages: development, introduction, growth, maturity, and decline (Qualtrics, n.d.).

The length of a product life cycle varies depending on the product type, market context, and business strategy. Some products remain stable for many years with minimal change. In fashion, however, garments are usually tied to rapid renewal cycles driven by seasons, trends, and marketing. This short cycle contributes to frequent replacement and rising textile waste.

A sustainability objective for fashion is therefore to extend the life cycle of garments, reducing replacement frequency and lowering overall environmental impact.

Image 8: Diagram comparing the linear economy with the circular economy model retrieved from https://lunalaluz.wordpress.com/2021/02/12/come-fare-moda-sostenibile/

4.2 Extending Product Life Through Modular Design

Modularity can extend garment life in practical ways. Instead of replacing an entire garment, the user can replace or upgrade only the part that is damaged, worn, or no longer functional.

For example:

• a worn-out collar or cuff can be replaced

• a lining can be updated without discarding the outer shell

• a component can be swapped to adapt the garment to a new season or use

In this way, modularity supports maintenance and renewal during the use phase, keeping garments in circulation for longer.

Modularity can also enable partial redesign. Updating a single module can refresh the aesthetics or functionality of a garment while preserving its main structure. This reduces the need for full replacement and helps maintain the value already embedded in materials and labour.

4.3 Reducing Waste and Resource Use

A modular approach can reduce waste by shifting production away from complete garments and toward standardised, interchangeable components. In principle, this supports more efficient resource use across time because:

• fewer full garments may be needed to achieve variation

• components can be produced, replaced, or repaired selectively

• garment updates may require fewer materials than new purchases

When designed well, modularity reduces waste not only at end-of-life but also across the product’s active lifespan, by preventing premature disposal.

4.4 Consumer Empowerment and a Culture of Repair

Modularity encourages behaviours that support sustainability, including repair, reuse, and customisation. Because garments can be altered without specialist intervention in some cases, users may feel more capable of maintaining and updating their clothing.

This reinforces a culture of care: garments are treated as adaptable objects that deserve maintenance rather than as disposable goods. Modularity can therefore support both practical longevity and more responsible consumer habits.

4.5 Potential Pitfalls

Despite its potential, modularity is not automatically sustainable. Two key risks should be considered:

Greenwashing
Modularity can be presented as a sustainability solution without producing meaningful reductions in impact. If modular garments are marketed as “circular” but are not designed for durability, repair, or genuine long-term use, modularity becomes a branding strategy rather than a sustainability practice.

Excessive complexity
Highly complex garments with too many components, difficult fastening systems, or confusing configurations can reduce usability. If a modular garment is inconvenient to assemble, uncomfortable, or visually inconsistent, it may discourage use — undermining the intended longevity benefits.

For modularity to support sustainability, the design must remain functional, durable, and easy to use, and it must encourage less consumption rather than merely different consumption.

5. Fundamental design principles for modularity

For modularity to function effectively, design decisions must prioritise compatibility, durability, and usability. Modular garments are systems, and like any system, they depend on clearly defined relationships between components.

5.1 Interchangeable Components

From historical tradition to contemporary fashion, the evolution of modular fashion shows a clear conceptual continuity: from the detachable sleeves of past centuries to modern interchangeable panels and components. This design logic gives rise to a veritable “wardrobe architecture”, built on a basic structure enriched with replaceable layers and coverings that allow the garment to transform and adapt to different contexts without losing aesthetic coherence.

Modular design is achieved by adding or removing components from a one-piece garment.
It is divided into two categories: single-function modules and multi-function modules (Zhang et al., 2024):

• Single-function module: the component has a fixed position and can be added or removed without altering the main structure of the garment. For example, a shirt with interchangeable collar, cuff, and pocket modules allows variation in appearance while maintaining structural integrity.

• Multi-function module: the component has two or more functions and role conversions. It consists of transforming the module from its original role to another, such as converting trousers into a skirt or sleeves into trouser legs.

5.2 Standardised Fastenings

In fashion, interfaces are the structural connections between modules that allow assembly and separation, such as closure systems.

From laces, ribbons, and buttons in earlier periods to press studs, magnets, and zips in the modern age, fastening systems have always been essential. To achieve a high level of modularity, it is necessary to use standardised interfaces — for example, consistent button sizes, identical eyelets, uniform zip lengths, and compatible hook dimensions (Casciani, 2023).

Standardisation enables modules to be interchanged, combined, or replaced repeatedly and flexibly, increasing system versatility.

Fastening interfaces must comply with two key properties:

• Standard fastenings: fastening systems must share the same type, length, and size to ensure compatibility.

• Ease of use: closure systems should be simple and limited to two functions — connecting and disconnecting modules.

5.3 Design for Disassembly and Repair

Design for disassembly is an approach that aims to create products that can be easily disassembled at the end of their life cycle, facilitating material separation for reuse, repair, or recycling (Transitions Project, n.d.). This involves developing garments with removable components such as buttons, zips, or linings.

This strategy extends garment life by simplifying the replacement of damaged parts and supporting transformation and reuse. Separating fabrics and accessories also improves recycling efficiency by avoiding fibre mixtures that are difficult to process.

Beyond technical considerations, design for disassembly promotes a more responsible consumption mindset by encouraging users to participate actively in maintenance and regeneration.

5.4 Material Compatibility

Material selection must support modular performance. Components should behave cohesively when assembled.

Designers must consider:

• Weight distribution

• Drape consistency

• Fibre shrinkage compatibility

• Resistance to stress at connection points

If materials respond differently to washing or wear, modular coherence deteriorates.

Compatibility, therefore affects both structural longevity and user experience.

5.5 Aesthetic Integrity

In modular fashion design, attention to aesthetic balance is as important as functionality. While maintaining the possibility of disassembling and reassembling the different elements, it is essential that the modules integrate visually in a coherent manner, avoiding unwanted contrasts or visual discontinuities.

• Colours: careful colour selection is essential to achieve a visually balanced design. The construction of a coherent palette can be based on different colour combinations: the use of analogous colours, which create soft and natural transitions; complementary colours, which generate dynamic contrasts; or monochromatic variations, which enhance the depth of a single shade.

• Proportions: in addition to colour choice, it is essential to consider the overall proportions of the garment, ensuring that each component, such as sleeves, neckline and hems, maintains visual consistency.

• Texture: the selection of materials and textures plays a decisive role in the appearance and perception of the garment. Combining surfaces with different tactile or visual characteristics can add depth and richness to the design, while maintaining a balanced and consistent overall aesthetic.

6. Cultural and consumer perspectives

The success of modular fashion depends not only on technical design but also on consumer perception and behaviour. Even the most carefully engineered modular garment will fail if users do not understand, trust, or value its flexibility. Modularity therefore operates at the intersection of design, psychology, and culture.

6.1 Consumer Behaviour and Fashion Culture

Fashion consumption is strongly influenced by social norms, identity construction, and trend cycles. Clothing is not only functional but symbolic; it communicates belonging, aspiration, and personal values.

Modular fashion challenges the dominant logic of rapid replacement. Instead of purchasing new garments to signal change, the wearer can reconfigure existing pieces. This shifts the focus from acquisition to adaptation.

However, such a shift requires behavioural adjustment. Consumers accustomed to fixed garments may initially perceive modular systems as unfamiliar or complex. The success of modular fashion therefore depends on intuitive design and clear communication. If the configuration process is cumbersome, the garment risks underuse.

Modularity can encourage more reflective consumption patterns by making transformation visible. When users actively participate in reconfiguring garments, they become more aware of the design process and material value embedded in clothing.

6.2 Minimalism and capsule wardrobes

A capsule wardrobe is based on a limited number of versatile, essential garments designed to create multiple combinations suitable for different contexts (Gilardi, n.d.).

Modular clothing operationalises this principle. By enabling multiple configurations from a single garment, it reduces the need for excessive quantities of clothing. This minimalist approach simplifies wardrobe management, limits impulsive purchasing, and encourages more thoughtful consumption.

In this sense, modularity aligns with contemporary movements toward intentional living and reduced material excess.

6.3 Barriers to Adoption

Modularity in fashion offers clear advantages, but several obstacles limit wider diffusion.

• Complexity of design and production → higher development costs and longer design phases.

• Limited standardisation → difficulty scaling modular systems industrially.

• Aesthetic scepticism → modularity may be perceived as overly technical or utilitarian.

• Gaps in consumer education → unfamiliarity reduces acceptance.

• Risk of “planned modular obsolescence” → spare parts could become profit-driven replacements rather than longevity tools.

These challenges translate into practical concerns:

• High production costs: Modular garments often require additional research, prototyping, and engineering to ensure structural compatibility and aesthetic coherence.

• Design complexity: Modules must align in fabric type, elasticity, weight, and construction. Misalignment can compromise fit, durability, and comfort.

• Limited consumer awareness: Many consumers remain unfamiliar with modular systems, which slows adoption.

• Low market diffusion: Modular fashion is more common in research contexts, niche brands, and experimental design than in large-scale industrial production.

• Higher retail prices: Because of increased development costs and, in many cases, sustainable material choices, modular garments may be less accessible to price-sensitive consumers.

For modularity to contribute meaningfully to sustainability, these structural and cultural barriers must be addressed.

6.4 Cultural symbolism

Historically, modular elements in clothing signified wealth and prestige. During the Renaissance, detachable lace sleeves and collars reflected economic power, as they required fine fabrics and complex craftsmanship.

Today, modularity carries different symbolic meaning. It is increasingly associated with sustainability and environmental awareness. Contemporary consumer choices are shaped by ecological knowledge, ethical positioning, and personal values. For some users, selecting adaptable and durable garments becomes a form of responsible self-expression.

Modularity therefore shifts from a marker of status to a marker of environmental consciousness.

Image 9: Capsule wardrobe example illustrating coordinated minimal garments, retrieved from https://dressthechange.org/portfolio/come-creare-un-guardaroba-capsule/

Image 10: Modular sustainable fashion designs by Flavia La Rocca, retrieved from https://www.vogue.it/vogue-talents/gallery/moda-sostenibile-le-collezioni-modulari-di-flavialarocca

7. Future Prospects

Modular fashion continues to evolve in response to technological innovation, material research, and changing consumer expectations. While modularity has historically appeared in decorative, military, and experimental contexts, its future development is increasingly linked to sustainability goals and digital transformation.

One area of growth lies in digital design and prototyping tools. Three-dimensional modelling software enables designers to simulate modular systems before physical production. Interfaces, attachment mechanisms, and component alignment can be tested virtually, reducing material waste during development. Digital environments also allow designers to visualise multiple configurations efficiently, improving precision and feasibility.

Advances in smart textiles and adaptive materials may further expand modular potential. Shape-memory fabrics, responsive materials, and engineered pleating systems introduce adaptability directly into textile structure. These innovations reduce reliance on mechanical components while maintaining flexibility.

Another promising direction is mass customization (Rinaldi, 2019). Digital platforms can allow consumers to select modules according to preference, body type, or functional need. When combined with on-demand production, this approach may reduce overproduction and inventory surplus.

Artificial intelligence and data analytics may also support modular systems by identifying which components are most frequently replaced or reconfigured. Such insights can inform design improvements and inventory planning, increasing system efficiency.

However, the future of modular fashion depends on balance. Technological advancement must not increase complexity to the point of reducing usability. Innovation should strengthen durability, accessibility, and adaptability rather than introduce unnecessary novelty.

If modularity is integrated carefully into design education, production systems, and consumer culture, it has the potential to move from niche experimentation toward broader industrial relevance.

Key Takeaways

• Modularity transforms garments into adaptable systems rather than fixed objects.

• Historical examples show modularity has long existed for functional and symbolic reasons.

• Modular design aligns with sustainability by extending product life during use.

• Product–Service Systems (PSS) can support module replacement and upgrade models.

• Technical precision in fastening systems and interfaces is essential.

• Consumer understanding and usability determine success.

• High costs and production complexity remain barriers to diffusion.

• Modularity can symbolise environmental awareness in contemporary culture.

• Digital tools and smart materials expand future modular possibilities.

• Modularity must prioritise durability over novelty to remain sustainable.

Summary

Modular fashion redefines clothing as a configurable system capable of evolving over time. By enabling replacement, adaptation, and transformation during the use phase, modular design offers an alternative to rapid replacement cycles. Its effectiveness depends on technical precision, aesthetic coherence, consumer understanding, and responsible implementation. When integrated thoughtfully into production systems and cultural practices, modularity can contribute to extending garment life and reducing material waste while preserving creative expression.

#

References

Arte a Palazzo. (n.d.). La moda nel XVI secolo: 1500–1550. Retrieved February 17, 2026, from https://www.arteapalazzo.it/moda/la-moda-nel-xvi-secolo-1500-1550/

bit schulungscenter. (n.d.). Unità 3: Il ciclo di vita dei tessuti [PDF]. WEAR(E)ABLE – Best dressed sustainably. Retrieved February 17, 2026, from https://www.weareable-fashion.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Unita-didattica-3_Il-ciclo-di-vita-dei-tessili.pdf

Blum, P. (2021). Circular fashion: Making the fashion industry sustainable. Laurence King Publishing.

Casciani, D. (2023). Fashion and modular design – Modularity as a design strategy for sustainability. AGATHÓN | International Journal of Architecture, Art and Design, 14, 326–337. https://doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/14282023

Chapman, J. (2005). Emotionally durable design: Objects, experiences and empathy. Earthscan.

DRESSX. (n.d.). Walk Me Out [Product page]. Retrieved February 17, 2026, from https://store.dressx.com/collections/all-collections/products/walk-me-out

Gilardi, G. (n.d.). Cos’è un capsule wardrobe e come crearne uno. Retrieved February 17, 2026, from https://giuliagilardi.com/cose-un-capsule-wardrobe-e-come-crearne-uno/

Il Vestito Verde. (n.d.). Moda digitale: La nuova era della moda sostenibile. Retrieved February 17, 2026, from https://www.ilvestitoverde.com/moda-digitale-la-nuova-era-della-moda-sostenibile/

Kornit Digital. (2023, May 24). Turning things around: How modular fashion and home décor boost sustainability. Retrieved February 17, 2026, from https://www.kornit.com/magazine/turning-things-around-how-modular-fashion-and-home-decor-boost-sustainability/

L’Officiel Italia. (2020, June 18). 5 minuti di storia della moda insieme a Issey Miyake. https://www.lofficielitalia.com/fashion/issey-miyake-storia-del-brand-designer-giapponese

Manteco. (n.d.). What is modular fashion: Circular design in a linear industry. Retrieved February 17, 2026, from https://manteco.com/what-is-modular-fashion-circular-design-in-a-linear-industry/

Mia Fondazione ITS. (n.d.). Innovazione digitale nella moda: Un cambiamento radicale. Retrieved February 17, 2026, from https://www.miafondazioneits.it/innovazione-digitale-nella-moda-un-cambiamento-radicale/

Offwrld Techwear. (n.d.). Modular clothing [Blog post]. Retrieved February 17, 2026, from https://www.offwrld-techwear.com/blogs/techwear-blog/modular-clothing

Prime Fit Uniforms. (2025). The definitive guide to military uniforms: History, types, & procurement best practices. https://primefituniforms.com/military-uniform

Qualtrics. (n.d.). Ciclo di vita del prodotto (Product lifecycle): Definizione e fasi (IT). Retrieved February 17, 2026, from https://www.qualtrics.com/it/experience-management/prodotto/ciclo-di-vita-del-prodotto/

Read the f*cking manual. (n.d.). Dieter Rams e i 10 principi del buon design. Retrieved February 17, 2026, from https://readthefmanual.it/dieter-rams-e-i-10-principi-de-buon-design/

Redress Design Award. (n.d.). Design for longevity. Retrieved February 17, 2026, from https://www.redressdesignaward.com/academy/resources/guide/design-for-longevity

Rinaldi, F. (2019). Fashion industry 2030: Reshaping the future through sustainability and responsible innovation. Bocconi University Press.

Slimstock. (n.d.). Cos’è il passaporto digitale dei prodotti (DPP). Retrieved February 17, 2026, from https://www.slimstock.com/it/blog/cose-il-passaporto-digitale-dei-prodotti/

Sustainability Directory. (n.d.). Adaptive fashion market → Term. Retrieved February 17, 2026, from https://fashion.sustainability-directory.com/term/adaptive-fashion-market/

Transitions Project. (n.d.). Design for disassembly. Retrieved February 17, 2026, from https://transitionsproject.eu/sustainability/design-for-disassembly/

Zhang, X., Le Normand, A., Yan, S., Wood, J., & Henninger, C. E. (2024). What is modular fashion: Towards a common definition. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 204, 107495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107495