1. Introduction: Defining Longevity in Fashion

Designing for longevity means creating garments that retain their functional performance, aesthetic relevance, and emotional significance over time. A long-lasting garment does more than resist physical wear; it continues to be valued, used, and cared for throughout its lifecycle.

The objective is not simply to produce durable clothing, but to design garments that remain desirable and adaptable. These may include styles that do not quickly fall out of fashion, versatile pieces that can be repaired or altered, and garments capable of evolving with the wearer. Longevity therefore operates at multiple levels: material, structural, cultural, and emotional.

Extending the useful life of clothing has measurable environmental benefits. When a garment is worn for longer, the environmental impacts associated with its production — including carbon emissions, water consumption, and resource extraction — are distributed across a longer period of use. Even doubling the lifespan of a garment can significantly reduce its overall environmental footprint, as fewer replacement items are required.

However, longevity cannot be reduced to material strength alone. Many garments are discarded not because they are damaged beyond repair, but because they lose relevance, desirability, or emotional value. For this reason, designing for longevity requires attention to both tangible and intangible dimensions of use.

Three interrelated principles underpin design for longevity:

• Physical resistance
  Garments must withstand repeated wear, washing, and handling. This depends on fibre quality, textile construction, and technical workmanship.

• Adaptability
  Clothing should accommodate changes in body shape, styling preferences, and seasonal conditions. Adjustable elements, thoughtful proportions, and flexible design strategies allow garments to remain wearable over time.

• Emotional durability
  Design can cultivate attachment. Through storytelling, craftsmanship, symbolism, and comfort, garments acquire meaning that strengthens the bond between wearer and object. When emotional value is present, users are more likely to maintain, repair, and retain clothing (Chapman, 2005).

At its core, the purpose of a garment is to be worn. A design that remains unused, regardless of its sustainability credentials, fails in its fundamental role. Understanding the needs, lifestyles, and values of wearers is therefore central to longevity. Designers must interpret not only trends, but also habits of care, patterns of use, and the cultural contexts in which garments exist.

Longevity is both a design strategy and a cultural position. It challenges the logic of rapid consumption by emphasising continuity over novelty. Rather than treating clothing as disposable, it frames garments as objects capable of carrying value — material, practical, and emotional — across time.

Image 1: Design examples illustrating durability and longevity strategies in childrenswear and denim garments, retrieved from https://www.redressdesignaward.com/academy/resources/guide/design-for-longevity

1.1 Learning Objectives

By the end of this module, learners should be able to:

• Define longevity as a multidimensional design strategy (physical, emotional, functional, and cultural durability)

• Explain how extending product life contributes to circular economy goals

• Identify design decisions that enhance durability, repairability, and adaptability

• Analyse the role of aesthetics, quality, and user attachment in slowing consumption cycles

• Critically assess planned obsolescence and trend-driven production models

• Integrate longevity principles into garment development processes

2. Historical and Cultural Contexts of Longevity

Before the Industrial Revolution, fashion operated according to principles that today would be recognised as sustainable. Garments were produced slowly and entirely by hand, using locally available natural materials such as wool, linen, and hemp (Blum, 2021). Production was closely connected to territory, craftsmanship, and resource availability. Because fabric required significant labour and cost to produce, it was treated as valuable and rarely wasted.

Cutting techniques often maximised fabric use. Textile remnants were reused as padding, patches, or incorporated into new garments. Clothing was worn for long periods, repaired when damaged, and reused across years or generations. Durability was not a trend — it was embedded in daily practice.

An illustrative example is the Japanese technique of boro, which developed among rural communities as a necessity-driven method of reinforcing worn garments. Scraps of indigo-dyed fabric were layered and stitched together, extending the life of textiles while gradually creating distinctive aesthetic surfaces. What began as repair evolved into a recognised cultural practice that demonstrates how scarcity can produce both resilience and beauty.

Image 2: Example of traditional Japanese boro textile repair using layered indigo fabrics and visible mending techniques, retrieved from https://www.sashiko.it/storia-del-sashiko/

In many tailoring traditions, garments were custom-made to fit the individual wearer. High-quality materials and skilled workmanship ensured that clothing could last decades. Garments were not anonymous products; they were personal possessions shaped by the body and by time.

Clothing also carried symbolic and emotional value. It signified identity, social belonging, and cultural continuity. Wedding dresses, ceremonial garments, and traditional attire such as the Japanese kimono were often preserved and passed down. The time invested in their creation and the complexity of their decoration reinforced their value and discouraged disposal.

Longevity, therefore, was supported not only by material durability, but by cultural meaning.

2.1 Industrialisation and the birth of fast fashion

The Industrial Revolution marked a profound shift. Mechanised production transformed clothing from a slow, craft-based practice into a high-volume industrial system. Synthetic fibres such as polyester, nylon, and acrylic lowered production costs and increased accessibility (Blum, 2021). Clothing became cheaper and more widely available.

However, this democratisation came with trade-offs. Reduced costs often meant reduced durability. As garments became easier to replace, repair practices declined. Today, a large proportion of textiles contain synthetic components, which are inexpensive to produce but may degrade in quality over short use cycles.

As garment quality declined, repair became less economically attractive. Consumers increasingly chose replacement over maintenance, reinforcing patterns of frequent disposal.

2.2 Planned obsolescence

The logic of planned obsolescence further accelerated this shift. Products were intentionally designed with limited lifespan, encouraging continuous repurchase. In fashion, this can involve the use of lower-quality materials, fragile construction, or rapidly changing trends that make garments feel outdated.

A survey conducted by the association Halte à l’Obsolescence Programmée (2025) highlighted this phenomenon in everyday clothing items. Respondents reported that modern tights lasted only a few wears before breaking, requiring repeated purchase within a single season. Such examples illustrate how reduced durability fuels ongoing consumption cycles.

2.3 Back to durability: Slow Fashion and Craft Revival

In the early 2000s, concerns about environmental impact and labour conditions gave rise to the Slow Fashion movement. Kate Fletcher (2014) emphasised that sustainability cannot be achieved solely through better materials or ethical production; it requires a rethinking of consumption patterns and of our relationship with clothing.

Slow fashion encourages care, repair, and personal engagement with garments. It shifts attention from the act of purchasing to the experience of wearing, maintaining, and valuing clothing over time.

Parallel to this movement, a renewed interest in craftsmanship — often described as a Craft Revival — has emerged. Traditional techniques such as weaving, embroidery, and natural dyeing are being re-explored within contemporary contexts. This revival is driven not only by nostalgia, but by a search for tactile, material authenticity in an increasingly digital world.

Sustainability plays a central role in this return to craft. Designers and artists often prioritise biodegradable materials, low-impact processes, and visible handwork. Rather than treating craftsmanship as decorative excess, it becomes a means of restoring value and extending lifespan.

Longevity, in this context, is both technical and cultural: it depends on how garments are made and on how they are perceived.

Image 2: Diagram illustrating the relationship between ethical fashion, eco fashion, and lasting fashion within the concept of slow fashion, retrieved from https://sociologicamente.it/slow-fashion-la-filosofia-consapevole-del-consumo/letter-from-the-editor-july-2018-261735-1530461132557-image_700x0c/

3. Fundamental design principles for longevity

Designing for longevity requires deliberate choices at every stage of development. A garment’s lifespan is shaped not only by its materials, but also by its aesthetic logic, construction quality, repairability, and emotional resonance.

3.1 Timeless design and aesthetics

Timeless fashion refers to garments that retain relevance beyond short-lived trends. Rather than responding to rapid seasonal cycles, timeless design emphasises proportion, balance, and material quality.

Such garments are typically characterised by:

• Clean, essential lines

• Neutral or versatile colour palettes

• Refined tailoring

• Adaptability across contexts and seasons

Examples include tailored blazers, classic trench coats, white shirts, denim jackets, and neutral knitwear. These pieces often form the basis of a capsule wardrobe because they can be styled in multiple ways and remain appropriate over time.

Timelessness does not mean resisting change entirely. Instead, it means designing garments that are not dependent on novelty for their appeal. When aesthetic value is sustained, garments are more likely to remain in use.

3.2 Material Selection

Material choice plays a decisive role in durability. However, durability depends not only on fibre type, but also on spinning, weaving, finishing, and care.

Natural fibres are often associated with longevity when properly constructed:

• Organic cotton avoids synthetic pesticides and fertilisers. When rain-fed, its water footprint can be significantly lower than conventional cotton. Its durability depends on fibre length and weave structure.

• Hemp requires minimal water, grows without pesticides, and contributes positively to soil health. Hemp textiles are known for strength, natural UV resistance, and antibacterial properties. Over time, the fabric softens without losing structure.

• Linen thrives in poor soils, requires relatively little irrigation, and allows full use of the plant. Modern finishing techniques have improved its crease resistance while preserving breathability and moisture regulation.

• Wool offers elasticity and resilience, allowing garments to retain shape and resist creasing.

Material longevity is therefore both ecological and technical. Designers must consider fibre performance, fabric construction, and long-term behaviour under repeated wear.

3.3 Quality of Construction

The design and construction of the garment are key to extending its durability.

Reinforcing areas subject to greater wear, such as elbows, knees or shoulders, with reinforced seams or additional layers, significantly extends the life of the garment (Fletcher, 2014). The inclusion of adjustable elements such as drawstrings, buttons or elastic inserts allows the garment to adapt to changes in the body over time, further extending its useful life.

Designs that physically extend the life of the garment.

Design for garments that are easy to clean, repair and maintain.

3.4 Design for Care and After-Sales Support

Longevity extends beyond the design studio. Care practices significantly affect garment life.

Clear, informative labels should guide users in washing, drying, ironing, and storage. Proper maintenance reduces fibre degradation and structural damage.

After-sales care strengthens this process. Services may include:

• Repair workshops

• Tailoring adjustments

• Refurbishment programmes

• DIY repair kits

For example, some brands offer lifetime repair services, reinforcing the idea that garments are meant to be maintained rather than replaced. Such initiatives shift the relationship between brand and customer from transaction to long-term partnership.

Design for care therefore integrates technical durability with service infrastructure.

3.5 Emotional Durability

Physical resistance alone does not guarantee extended use. Many garments are discarded while still structurally intact because they no longer feel meaningful.

Emotional durability refers to the capacity of a garment to maintain personal relevance (Chapman, 2005). This may derive from:

• Fit and comfort

• Craftsmanship and visible skill

• Cultural symbolism

• Personal memory

• Unique ageing characteristics

When a garment acquires narrative value, users are more inclined to repair and preserve it.

Traditional repair techniques such as sashiko illustrate how maintenance can enhance rather than diminish aesthetic value. Visible mending reframes wear as history rather than defect.

Emotional durability therefore reinforces physical longevity. The stronger the bond between wearer and garment, the longer it remains in use.

Image 3: Example of traditional sashiko stitching and its contemporary application in sustainable fashion design, retrieved from https://www.harpersbazaar.in/fashion/story/could-the-japanese-art-of-sashiko-sew-meaning-back-into-sustainable-fashion-1264943-2025-08-24

4. Design methodologies and frameworks

Design for longevity does not operate in isolation. It is supported by broader design frameworks that encourage systemic thinking, lifecycle awareness, and material responsibility. These frameworks help designers situate individual garments within larger economic and environmental systems.

4.1 Circular Design Principles

The Circular Design Guide developed by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation (n.d.) proposes a shift from the traditional linear model — extract, produce, consume, dispose — toward a regenerative system in which materials circulate at their highest possible value.

While circularity often emphasises recycling, longevity plays a foundational role. The longer a product remains in use, the less pressure is placed on resource extraction and material recovery systems.

Key circular principles relevant to longevity include:

• Design without waste: products should be conceived to minimise waste during production and facilitate repair or reuse.

• Modularity and adaptability: garments should evolve over time rather than become obsolete.

• Material recovery: materials should be capable of re-entering technical or biological cycles when the garment can no longer be used.

• Systemic thinking: products must be understood as part of interconnected supply chains, user behaviours, and end-of-life infrastructures.

• Renewable energy use: production processes should reduce reliance on fossil fuels.

Within this hierarchy, extending use is often more impactful than recycling. Longevity therefore strengthens circular systems by delaying material throughput.

Image 4: Circular economy diagram illustrating biological and technical material cycles and value retention strategies, retrieved from https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/circulate-products-and-materials

4.2 Life Cycle Thinking (LCT) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)

Life Cycle Thinking (LCT) encourages designers to consider all stages of a garment’s existence — from raw material extraction to production, distribution, use, and end-of-life (Kaynak et al., 2025). Each stage generates environmental impact, including greenhouse gas emissions, water consumption, chemical pollution, and resource depletion.

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) provides a structured method for measuring these impacts (Kaynak et al., 2025). By analysing environmental burdens across the entire lifecycle, designers can identify critical intervention points.

In the context of longevity, LCA reinforces a key insight: extending a garment’s active use phase significantly reduces its annual environmental impact. If a garment is worn twice as long, its production footprint is effectively distributed across a longer period of service. LCA therefore supports durability and care strategies as practical pathways toward impact reduction.

4.3 Cradle to Cradle

Cradle to Cradle, developed by William McDonough and Michael Braungart (2002), proposes replacing the “cradle to grave” model with a circular system in which materials function as nutrients within biological or technical cycles.

In this model:

• Biological materials safely return to nature.

• Technical materials circulate within industrial systems without degrading in quality.

Although Cradle to Cradle emphasises material recovery, it does not diminish the importance of longevity. A garment that remains in use for decades delays entry into recovery systems, reducing resource demand.

The Cradle to Cradle Certified™ framework evaluates products across five categories:

• Material health

• Material reuse

• Renewable energy and climate impact

• Water stewardship

• Social equity

For designers, this framework encourages safe material selection and anticipates future reuse, but longevity remains the first strategy before cycling begins.

Image 5: Diagram distinguishing biological and technical cycles in the Cradle to Cradle design framework, retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Distinction-between-biological-and-technical-cycles-in-the-Cradle-to-Cradle-design_fig2_322555840

4.4 Dieter Rams: “Good Design Is Long-Lasting”

Industrial designer Dieter Rams (n.d.) articulated ten principles of good design, one of which states that good design is long-lasting. According to Rams, durable design avoids being fashionable or decorative for its own sake. Instead, it prioritises clarity, usefulness, and restraint. According to Rams, good design must be:

1. Good design is innovative

2. Good design makes a product useful

3. Good design is aesthetic

4. Good design makes a product understandable

5. Good design is discreet

6. Good design is honest

7. Good design is durable

8. Good design pays attention to detail

9. Good design is environmentally friendly

10. Good design is as little design as possible

Rams’ philosophy reinforces the connection between functional clarity and longevity. A well-designed product does not rely on novelty for relevance. In fashion, this translates into garments that maintain appeal through proportion, quality, and thoughtful detail rather than through trend-driven excess.

5. Craftsmanship, Supply Chain and Business Strategy

Longevity is not determined by design decisions alone. It is shaped by craftsmanship, supplier relationships, and the economic models that support or undermine extended use. A durable garment depends on a network of actors who share responsibility for quality and long-term value.

5.1 Craftsmanship and Industrial Quality

Longevity begins with technical competence. High-quality materials alone do not guarantee durability if construction is weak or imprecise. Craftsmanship preserves knowledge accumulated across generations and translates it into structural resilience.

The Italian production model offers a relevant example of this integration between tradition and innovation. In regions such as the textile district of Prato — one of Europe’s most important textile hubs — specialised companies operate within interconnected networks. Thousands of firms contribute to yarn production, fabric development, finishing, and garment construction (Città di Prato, n.d.). This concentration of expertise allows for continuous refinement of materials and techniques.

In such contexts, craftsmanship is not a nostalgic reference to the past; it is a strategic asset. Precision in weaving, dyeing, finishing, and tailoring enhances durability and consistency. When industry and craft operate together, they strengthen the link between territory, material knowledge, and long-term product quality.

Longevity therefore relies on both technical excellence and continuity of skills.

Image 6: Aerial view of the Prato textile district, retrieved from https://www.cittadiprato.it/IT/Sezioni/436/DISTRETTO-TESSILE/

5.2 Relationships with Suppliers and Material Sourcing

In sustainable fashion, supplier relationships are as critical as design concepts. Longevity depends on the reliability and integrity of materials, which in turn depend on transparent supply chains.

Building long-term partnerships with suppliers fosters:

• Consistent material quality

• Shared sustainability standards

• Traceability of fibres and processes

• Stability in production methods

Traceability strengthens brand credibility and reinforces perceived value. When designers understand the origin of fibres and production conditions, they can make informed decisions that support durability and environmental responsibility.

Local sourcing can further contribute to longevity strategies. Shorter supply chains reduce transportation impact and facilitate closer quality control. Proximity may also enable repair networks and post-purchase services that extend garment life.

In this sense, the supply chain becomes part of a circular value system rather than a linear production pipeline.

5.3 Narrative and Emotional Longevity in Business Practice

Although emotional durability has already been discussed at the design level, it also has a strategic dimension within business models.

Garments are often discarded not because they fail structurally, but because their perceived value declines. Communication, storytelling, and customer engagement influence whether a product is maintained or replaced.

Brands can support emotional longevity through:

• Transparent storytelling about origin and craftsmanship

• Emphasis on repair and maintenance culture

• Honest communication about durability

• Community-building initiatives

Customer relationship management (CRM) strategies can extend the brand–consumer relationship beyond the point of sale (Salesforce, n.d.). Personalised communication, loyalty programmes, and service-oriented engagement reinforce long-term attachment.

An example is the Barbour Re-Loved initiative, which invites customers to return used jackets. These garments are repaired, refurbished, and reintroduced into circulation. This approach combines emotional continuity with material regeneration, allowing garments to retain value across multiple lifecycles.

Such initiatives demonstrate that longevity can be embedded in both product design and commercial strategy.

5.4 Business Models for Longevity

Longevity challenges conventional revenue models based on rapid turnover (Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2017). Instead of encouraging frequent replacement, businesses can generate value through extended service. Models aligned with longevity include :

• Repair services and warranties

• Refurbishment and resale platforms

• Rental systems

• Product take-back schemes

• Lifetime guarantees

For example, Patagonia’s repair and warranty policies reinforce consumer trust while encouraging responsible use. By offering repair, replacement, or refund options when products fail, the brand positions durability as a core commitment rather than a marketing claim.

Design decisions must anticipate these business strategies. A garment cannot be refurbished or repaired efficiently if its construction does not allow for intervention. Longevity therefore requires coordination between design, manufacturing, and commercial planning.

When commercial logic aligns with durability, fashion shifts from a volume-driven model to a value-driven one.

6. Longevity and the Circular Economy (Digital and systemic enablers)

Longevity represents the first and most effective strategy within a circular fashion system. Every time a garment remains in use for longer, the need to produce new garments decreases. This reduces pressure on raw materials, manufacturing processes, and energy consumption.

While circular economy discourse often focuses on recycling, durability and extended use preserve far more value. Recycling intervenes only once a garment can no longer fulfil its function. Longevity delays this moment, maintaining both material and use value within the system.

In this sense, longevity does not compete with recycling or modularity; it strengthens them. A garment designed for long-term use can still later enter repair, resale, refurbishment, or recycling systems. The circular model therefore operates sequentially: use first, recovery later.

6.1 Digital and Systemic Enablers

Digital technologies increasingly support longevity by improving transparency, traceability, and accountability across the supply chain.

Blockchain technology allows information about sourcing, manufacturing, and distribution to be recorded in secure digital ledgers (IBM, n.d.). This enhances trust and helps verify sustainability claims. For consumers, transparency reinforces confidence in product quality and ethical standards — both of which contribute to perceived long-term value.

Blockchain can also combat counterfeiting by associating each garment with a verifiable digital history. Authenticity strengthens emotional and economic value, encouraging preservation rather than disposal.

Closely linked to this development is the Digital Product Passport (DPP) — a system that stores essential lifecycle information in a digital format accessible through QR codes, barcodes, or NFC tags (Slimstock, n.d.).

A Digital Product Passport may include:

• Product identity and origin

• Material composition

• Environmental footprint

• Repair and maintenance guidance

• Expected lifespan

• End-of-life options

• Certifications and regulatory compliance

By centralising this information, DPPs support informed decision-making at multiple levels: manufacturers can trace supply chains more accurately; retailers can manage inventory responsibly; consumers can access repair instructions and care recommendations.

In the case of defects or recalls, digital traceability allows rapid identification of production stages or material batches. This strengthens quality control and accountability.

Importantly, digital systems do not replace design strategies for longevity — they reinforce them. Transparency makes durability claims verifiable. Access to repair information encourages maintenance. Traceable material composition facilitates eventual recycling when necessary. Longevity therefore operates within a broader systemic framework where design, technology, and infrastructure align to extend value over time.

7. Future Directions

Longevity in fashion represents more than extended durability; it reflects a shift in cultural and economic values. It challenges the assumption that novelty defines relevance and instead positions continuity, care, and quality as central design principles. Designing for longevity requires integration across multiple dimensions:

• Material integrity

• Construction quality

• Adaptability and repairability

• Emotional attachment

• Transparent supply chains

• Business models aligned with extended use

Craftsmanship preserves technical knowledge and ensures structural resilience. Digital tools such as blockchain and Digital Product Passports enhance transparency and accountability. Service-based business models encourage repair, resale, and refurbishment. Together, these elements form an ecosystem that supports garments over time.

Emerging technologies may further reinforce longevity strategies. For example, 3D printing offers opportunities for on-demand production and customisation. By reducing overproduction and enabling precise manufacturing, additive technologies may help minimise surplus inventory. Custom-fit production can also improve garment satisfaction, increasing the likelihood of long-term use.

However, technology alone cannot guarantee longevity. Without thoughtful design and cultural change, innovations risk accelerating consumption rather than reducing it. The key lies in aligning technological efficiency with durable design principles.

Longevity ultimately redefines value. It invites designers to consider garments not as temporary commodities, but as objects capable of accumulating meaning through use. By integrating tradition and innovation, craftsmanship and digital tools, fashion can move toward a model where garments are designed not merely to be sold — but to endure.

Key Takeaways

• Longevity is one of the most effective sustainability strategies in fashion.

• Durability includes physical resistance, adaptability, and emotional value.

• Timeless aesthetics reduce trend-driven disposal.

• High-quality construction enables repair and maintenance.

• Emotional attachment significantly influences garment retention.

• Craftsmanship and skilled production support structural resilience.

• Transparent supply chains strengthen long-term value.

• Business models (repair, resale, warranties) must align with durability.

• Digital tools (e.g. DPP, blockchain) reinforce traceability and accountability.

• Longevity works within circular systems by delaying material throughput.

Final Summary

Design for longevity reframes fashion from a system of rapid turnover to one of sustained value. By combining durable materials, technical precision, adaptable construction, emotional resonance, and supportive business infrastructures, designers can significantly reduce environmental impact while strengthening cultural meaning. Longevity is not a limitation on creativity; it is a design ethic that positions time as a core dimension of sustainability.

References

Art Info Land Magazine. (n.d.). Craft revival: Textiles and heritage make a comeback. https://magazine.artinfoland.com/craft-revival-textiles-and-heritage-make-a-comeback/

Barbour. (n.d.). Re-loved. https://www.barbour.com/it/re-loved

Blum, P. (2021). Circular fashion: Making the fashion industry sustainable. Laurence King Publishing.

Centric Software. (n.d.). Sustainable textile materials. https://www.centricsoftware.com/blog/sustainable-textile-materials/

Città di Prato. (n.d.). Textile district. https://www.cittadiprato.it/EN/Sezioni/437/TEXTILE-DISTRICT/

Chapman, J. (2005). Emotionally durable design: Objects, experiences and empathy. Earthscan.

Dylon. (n.d.). Slow fashion stories: The faces of slow fashion – Kate Fletcher. https://www.dylon.co.uk/detergents/blog/rethink-new-blog/slow-fashion-stories/the-faces-of-slow-fashion-kate-fletcher.html

Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2019). Circular economy systems diagram (Butterfly diagram). https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/circular-economy-diagram

Fletcher, K. (2014). Sustainable fashion and textiles: Design journeys (2nd ed.). Earthscan.

Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2017). A new textiles economy: Redesigning fashion’s future. https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/a-new-textiles-economy

Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (n.d.). The circular design guide. https://www.circulardesignguide.com

Halte à l’Obsolescence Programmée (HOP). (2025). Made to overconsume: Survey on marketing obsolescence and the influence of commercial strategies. https://www.halteobsolescence.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Made-to-overconsume-HOP-report.pdf

IBM. (n.d.). What is blockchain? https://www.ibm.com/it-it/think/topics/blockchain

Kaynak, E., Piri, I. S., & Das, O. (2025). Revisiting the basics of life cycle assessment and lifecycle thinking. Sustainability, 17(16), 7444.

McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. North Point Press.

MDPI. (n.d.). Sustainability, 15(5), 4451. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4451

Niinimäki, K. (2018). Sustainable fashion in a circular economy. Aalto ARTS Books.

Observatorio Amianto. (n.d.). Economia circolare. https://www.osservatorioamianto.it/economia-circolare/

Petit Pli. (n.d.). Home. https://shop.petitpli.com/

Petit Pli. (n.d.). A sustainable childrenswear revolution. https://shop.petitpli.com/pages/a-sustainable-childrenswear-revolution-2

Rams, D. (n.d.). Ten principles for good design. Vitsoe. https://www.vitsoe.com/gb/about/good-design

Redress Design Award. (n.d.). Design for longevity. https://www.redressdesignaward.com/academy/resources/guide/design-for-longevity

Read the F Manual. (n.d.). Dieter Rams e i 10 principi del buon design. https://readthefmanual.it/dieter-rams-e-i-10-principi-de-buon-design/

Rinaldi, F. (2019). Fashion industry 2030: Reshaping the future through sustainability and responsible innovation. Bocconi University Press.

Salesforce. (n.d.). What is CRM? https://www.salesforce.com/eu/crm/what-is-crm

Slimstock. (n.d.). Cos’è il passaporto digitale dei prodotti. https://www.slimstock.com/it/blog/cose-il-passaporto-digitale-dei-prodotti/

State of Matter Apparel. (n.d.). Timeless fashion: An alternative to fast fashion. https://stateofmatterapparel.com/blogs/som-blog/timeless-fashion-an-alternative-to-fast-fashion

Sustainability Directory. (n.d.). Textile durability. https://lifestyle.sustainability-directory.com/term/textile-durability/

Sustainability Directory. (n.d.). How can history reduce fashion waste? https://fashion.sustainability-directory.com/question/how-can-history-reduce-fashion-waste/

The Pennsylvania State University, Environmental Innovations Initiative. (n.d.). Fast fashion. https://environment.upenn.edu/news-events/news/fast-fashion

The Sign Speaking. (n.d.). Petit Pli clothes that grow with children. https://www.thesignspeaking.com/it/petit-pli-clothes-that-grow-with-children/

TRVST World. (n.d.). History of sustainable fashion. https://www.trvst.world/sustainable-living/fashion/history-of-sustainable-fashion/